In ways that have rarely been examined and even less
often understood, ideas about responsibility affect the operation of the
criminal justice system. The assignment and denial of responsibility are
among the hottest legal, moral, and political issues in contemporary
American society. But for all of the recent talk in politics and
business about accountability, the United States remains a one-sided
lyno-fault
society: People take credit for their accomplishments but disown their
mistakes. If Harry Truman were president today, the sign on his desk
would probably read: If you play your cards right, the buck never stops.
- Jack Kamerman, Negotiating Responsibility in the Criminal Justice
System.
Are you sure that your truth and your justice are
worth more than the truths and justices of other centuries? —
Simone de Beauvoir, All Men are Mortal.
Where does one run...when he is already in the
promised land? - Robert L. Dupont, MD
The philosophical foundations of American criminal justice are drawn
from the long historical journey of man-as-community. This journey is a
chronology of the development of systems of social control, crime, legal
institutions and punishment. We will examine a series of debates -- some
beginning more than two thousand years ago -- about the ideas of law and
justice to formulate the connection between these debates and the
everyday operation of our system of criminal justice.
In this context, it is important to remember that the explanation of
criminal behavior is not independent of or different from the
explanation of noncriminal behavior. Basically, an explanation is a
"sensible" relating of some particular phenomenon in question
to the whole field of knowledge. It is the on-going development of
various theories of crime and criminals. It must be admitted that with
the best intentions, and despite much effort, human behavior is still
not completely understood. Will it ever be? I think not.
In the true spirit of philosophical inquiry, we must concede that
"philosophy is the search for the indefinable." Try it out:
what is your philosophy and theory of punishment? A theory is simply
part of an explanation. For example, attempts to formulate more
satisfactory theories of human behavior in general are the principal
content of the whole of human behavior sciences, namely, biology,
medicine, psychiatry, psychology, social psychology, and sociology.
It therefore should come as a surprise to no one that current
theories of criminality are often questionable and leave much to be
desired from the standpoint of adequacy and of scientific validity.
READINGS
The required texts to be used in this course are:
Ethics in Crime and Justice, (3rd Edition), Joycelyn
M. Pollock, Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth Publisher, 1998 [plus INFOTRAC,
College Edition http://www.infotrac-college.com/wadsworth].
Four months provided free with purchase of course textbook.
Negotiating Responsibility in the Criminal Justice System,
Jack Kamerman, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1998.
Additional readings will be assigned in readily available texts and
via class handouts.
NOTE: YOU MUST HAVE THE COURSE TEXTBOOKS AND A STANDARD (OXFORD OR
WEBSTER’S) DICTIONARY IN CLASS WITH YOU AT ALL TIMES.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
People have to show up in life: your attendance pattern
(tardiness/absenteeism) will be factored into your final academic grade
determination.
Warning: do not exceed five absentee days in this course semester.
Do NOT bring food into this classroom (seventy-five minutes of
abstinence from food and drink is nourishing to the body and
soul...especially in a philosophy class...become a true ascetic
vis-a-vis a hedonist.
There are three mandatory requirements every student must meet. They
are: (1) a mid-term examination, which counts for 30
percent of the final grade; (2) a final examination
which counts for 20 percent of the final grade; and (3), a term
paper, which counts for 50 percent of the course grade.
The term paper, in the form of a five-page exegesis, is to be
developed from the independent reading and interpolation of the
responsibility thesis of the 12 sections of the Kamerman book. Moreover,
this exegesis is to be developed in direct relation to your
understanding ofthe overall course content (lectures, guest speakers,
and discussion) and, specifically, your readings of the primary text of
the course: Ethics in Crime and Justice.
The optional development of a glossary of words and terms discovered
in this class can also be submitted for a consideration of additional
full-points on the final course grade. The objective of this glossary
development assignment is to enrich your capabilities for analyzing
sources of information and to develop the ability for making necessary
distinctions of definitions within the "text" and
"context" of the course content and subsets of subject matter.
THE GLOSSARY
In the development of a philosophy and criminal justice glossary, I
refer you also to the nine field-specific dictionaries in the UIC
Library: the Dictionary of Philosophy; the Dictionary of Philosophy and
Psychology; the Dictionary of Ethics, Theology, & Society; the
Criminal Justice Vocabulary; the Criminal Justice Dictionary; Crime
Dictionary; Dictionary of American Penology; Dictionary of Sociology;
Black’s Law Dictionary; MacMillan Dictionary of Psychology;
Encyclopedia of World Crime Dictionary; The Early-Intervention
Dictionary; The Police Dictionary and Encyclopedia; The Law Enforcement
Vocabulary; Definitions in Convergence Conflict and Alternative
Vocabularies.
Reading Schedule
|
Tuesday, January 09
|
Course Introduction - Ground Rules - Scope
Spur
|
|
Thursday, January 11
|
Preface - Table-of-Contents - Pollock/Kamerman
Spur
|
|
Tuesday, January 16
|
Pollock Chapter 1:1-23
Spur
|
|
Thursday, January 18
|
Pollock Chapter 1:1-23 – cont’d.
|
|
Tuesday, January 23
|
Pollock – Ethical Dilemmas pgs22/23 - Class Panel
Spur
|
|
Thursday, January 25
|
Pollock - Chapter 2:24-56
Spur
|
|
Tuesday, January 30
|
Pollock – Chapter 2:24-56 – cont’d.
|
|
Thursday, February 01
|
Pollock – Chapter 3:57-84
Spur
Spur
Spur
|
|
Tuesday, February 06
|
Pollock - Chapter 3:57-84 (take-home – up to 5 points
course grade)
|
|
Thursday, February 08
|
"Quis custodiet ipses custodes?"/ Who polices the
police? Guest Speaker
Spur
|
|
Tuesday, February 13
|
Pollock - Chapter 4:85-132
|
|
Thursday, February 15
|
Pollock - Chapter 4:85-132
Spur
|
|
Tuesday, February 20
|
Pollock - Chapter 5:133-161
Spur
|
|
Thursday, February 22
|
Pollock- Chapter 5:133-161
Spur
|
|
Tuesday, February 27
|
Pollock - Chapter 6:162-203
Spur
|
|
Thursday, March 01
|
Pollock - Chapter 6:162-203
Spur
Spur
|
|
Tuesday, March 06
|
Mid-Term Examination Review
|
|
Thursday, March 08
|
Mid-Term Examination
|
|
Monday - Friday, March 12th - 16th
|
SPRING BREAK
|
|
Tuesday, March 20
|
Pollock - Chapter 7:204-234
Spur
|
|
Thursday, March 22
|
Pollock - Chapter 8:235-256
|
|
Tuesday, March 27
|
Pollock - Chapter 8:235-256
|
|
Thursday, March 29
|
DISARRAY
spur
|
|
Tuesday, April 03
|
Pollock - Chapter 9:257-286
|
|
Thursday, April 05
|
Pollock - Chapter 9:257-286
|
|
Tuesday, April 10
|
Pollock - Chapter 10:287-324
|
|
Thursday, April 12
|
Pollock - Chapter 10:287-324
|
|
Tuesday, April 17
|
Police Officer: WHISTLEBLOWER
Guest Speaker
|
|
Thursday, April 19
|
Pollock - Chapter 11:325-346
|
|
Tuesday, April 24
|
COURSE SUMMARY - Exegesis Due
Spur
Spur
|
|
Thursday, April 26
|
Final Exam Review Session
|
|
Glossary can be submitted at final exam
session.
|
|
Final Exam(s): Monday, 04/30 - 05/04
Will YOU
Receive One of These?
|
Course Resources